Best Picture, 1932-33

Awards presented March 16, 1934
(Films released from August 1, 1932 through December 31, 1933 were eligible.)

The nominees were ... 
... when they should have been ...
And the Oscar went to ...
Cavalcade. Early 20th-century history seen through its effect on a well-to-do English family and its servants. If that sounds like "Upstairs Downstairs" and "Downton Abbey," you've got it. But while the movie, based on a play by Noël Coward, touches on the same Anglophilia that made the TV series so popular, it remains one of the least-seen best picture winners. It's not bad, but on the other hand, it's been done better.

... when it should have gone to ...
King Kong
Let's face it: What other 1933 film has had a longer and stronger effect on Hollywood, inspiring more sequels, remakes, and ripoffs? Or has initiated more social, racial, or anthropological commentary? The special-effects industry owes everything to its success. Yet King Kong received not a single nomination in any category. (It was in good company in that regard: neither did Ernst Lubitsch's Trouble in Paradise, Clark Gable and Jean Harlow's Red Dust, the star-studded Dinner at Eight, or the Marx Brothers' Duck Soup.) But 80 years have passed, and the myth of Kong and the beauty who killed the beast is still alive.



No comments:

Post a Comment