Showing posts with label Cavalcade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cavalcade. Show all posts

Best Art Direction, 1932-33

Awards presented March 16, 1934
(Films released from August 1, 1932 through December 31, 1933 were eligible.)


The nominees were ... 

... when they should have been ... 
And the Oscar went to ... 
William S. Darling, Cavalcade. The first of three Oscars from a total of seven nominations for the Hungarian-born art director. 

... when it should have gone to ... 
Anton Grot points out a set detail for director Mervyn LeRoy, choreographer Busby Berkeley, and some dancers
"The Waltz of the Shadows" 
Joan Blondell sings "Remember My Forgotten Man" 
"We're in the Money"
 Grot came to the United States from Poland in 1909, bringing with him an awareness of the latest trends in expressionist and modernist design. His breakthrough in film came when he was hired in 1922 to design the sets for Douglas Fairbanks's Robin Hood. In 1928 he began a frequent collaboration with director Michael Curtiz on Noah's Ark, and eventually became head of the art department at Warner Bros., a position he held until he retired in 1948. His imagination happened to mesh beautifully with that of dance director Busby Berkeley, and they also worked together on Footlight Parade (1933) and Gold Diggers of 1935. Grot was nominated five times, but never won, though he shared in the Warners art department's win in 1941 for a "water ripple and wave illusion machine."

Best Director, 1932-33

Awards presented March 16, 1934
(Films released from August 1, 1932 through December 31, 1933 were eligible.)


The nominees were ... 

... when they should have been ... 
Frank Lloyd, Cavalcade. The oft-told story goes that on Oscar night, when Will Rogers presented the award for best director, he chatted on about his friend Frank before calling out, "Come up and get it, Frank!" Whereupon Frank Capra, who had expected to win for Lady for a Day, which had been a big hit, leaped from his seat and headed for the dais, only to realize that the spotlight was on Frank Lloyd instead. Capra slunk back to his seat in embarrassment. It was Capra himself who told the story in his autobiography, so there's no reason to doubt it except that no contemporary accounts of Oscar night mention it. This was Lloyd's second Oscar, but after a third nomination, for Mutiny on the Bounty, his career began to slump into mediocrity. 

... when it should have gone to ... 
Rouben Mamoulian
Jeanette MacDonald and Maurice Chevalier in Love Me Tonight 
Myrna Loy, Chevalier, and MacDonald in Love Me Tonight 
Is it a tribute to Mamoulian that I always forget that this film was directed by him and not by Ernst Lubitsch? It's a wonderfully giddy musical, with the Rodgers and Hart songs ("Isn't It Romantic?," "Mimi," "Lover" and the title song) seamlessly and wittily woven into the texture of the film. It's also probably the best of the four musicals starring Maurice Chevalier and Jeanette MacDonald. (The other three were directed by Lubitsch.) Mamoulian became a celebrated stage director, helming the premieres of Porgy and Bess, Oklahoma!  and Carousel, but Love Me Tonight shows that he had a fine touch with movies, too, though the Academy never took note of him. He seemed to get crosswise with the studios: He was hired to direct Laura (1944), but fired from the picture because his ideas were so different from those of the producer, Otto Preminger, who took over directing it. In 1959 he was set to direct the film version of Porgy and Bess, but disagreed with producer Sam Goldwyn, who replaced him with (again) Preminger. And he was the first director hired for what became Elizabeth Taylor's Cleopatra (Mamoulian wanted Dorothy Dandridge instead) and quit when it became clear that the project was going to be uncontrollable.

Best Picture, 1932-33

Awards presented March 16, 1934
(Films released from August 1, 1932 through December 31, 1933 were eligible.)

The nominees were ... 
... when they should have been ...
And the Oscar went to ...
Cavalcade. Early 20th-century history seen through its effect on a well-to-do English family and its servants. If that sounds like "Upstairs Downstairs" and "Downton Abbey," you've got it. But while the movie, based on a play by Noël Coward, touches on the same Anglophilia that made the TV series so popular, it remains one of the least-seen best picture winners. It's not bad, but on the other hand, it's been done better.

... when it should have gone to ...
King Kong
Let's face it: What other 1933 film has had a longer and stronger effect on Hollywood, inspiring more sequels, remakes, and ripoffs? Or has initiated more social, racial, or anthropological commentary? The special-effects industry owes everything to its success. Yet King Kong received not a single nomination in any category. (It was in good company in that regard: neither did Ernst Lubitsch's Trouble in Paradise, Clark Gable and Jean Harlow's Red Dust, the star-studded Dinner at Eight, or the Marx Brothers' Duck Soup.) But 80 years have passed, and the myth of Kong and the beauty who killed the beast is still alive.