Showing posts with label John Barrymore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Barrymore. Show all posts

Best Supporting Actor, 1936

Awards presented March 4, 1937

This new category was a necessary addition to the Awards, recognizing the importance of performances other than in the lead roles. It may have been created in response to the 1934 Oscars, when Frank Morgan, in a supporting role in The Affairs of Benvenuto Cellini, received a nomination for best actor instead of Fredric March, who had the leading role, the title character. But the problem the Academy has always been up against is determining what constitutes a leading role and what a supporting one. The first list of nominees shows by its diversity how hard it is to define what constitutes a "supporting" performance. Auer and Erwin were comic types in roles that asked them to do little more than adhere to their established types. Tamiroff was an Armenian-born actor trained by Stanislavski at the Moscow Art Theater whose career consisted almost entirely of playing whatever ethnicity the movie needed, from Russian to Turkish, from Spanish to -- in his nominated role -- Chinese. Rathbone, a classically trained actor, became best known as Sherlock Holmes and as a swashbuckling villain, and was nominated for playing a swashbuckling Shakespearean villain, Tybalt. And Brennan was the actor for whom the award seemed to be invented, since he won it three times.

The nominees were ... 

... when they should have been ... 
Brennan had been in Hollywood since 1923, working as an extra and a stuntman and gradually moving into character roles. But not until 1935, when director Howard Hawks cast him as a character called "Old Atrocity" in Barbary Coast, did Brennan become the prime scene-stealer that won him three supporting actor Oscars -- one every other year from 1937 through 1941. Before he was fired from the film, Hawks also cast Brennan in Come and Get It and built up what was originally a much smaller role. Brennan and Hawks made four more films together: Sergeant York, To Have and Have Not, Red River, and Rio Bravo. 

... when it should have gone to ... 
Basil Rathbone as Tybalt confronts John Barrymore as Mercutio
Leslie Howard as Romeo with Barrymore as Tybalt
Barrymore's Tybalt listens in as Juliet's nurse (Edna May Oliver) speaks with Howard as Romeo
Well, no, it really won't do as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. But as MGM's attempt to pass off some aging, balding actors as Shakespeare's teenagers, it has its moments, especially when Barrymore is around to lighten things up with some prime hamming. He and Rathbone are well-matched as antagonists, though Rathbone is a good ten years younger and in much better physical shape. This would be Barrymore's last distinguished film performance, with the possible exception of a smaller role in Midnight (1939), before alcoholism took its toll.  

Best Actor, 1934

Awards presented February 27, 1935


The nominees were ... 
... when they should have been ... 
Clark Gable in It Happened One Night.
Nothing wrong with this, really. Gable gives a great comic-romantic performance in a role for which he wasn't the first choice -- Robert Montgomery was -- and for which it's said that MGM loaned him out as a punishment for refusing a role they wanted him to play. In 1934 he was just one leading man among many in Hollywood, having begun his screen career as an extra and in small roles in 1923. He first attracted real notice as the villain in A Free Soul (1931), with Lionel Barrymore, who had seen him on stage and arranged for him to be cast in the role. It soon became clear that Gable was a good screen partner for Joan Crawford and Jean Harlow, both of them tough-girl types who needed a strong masculine presence opposite them. The Oscar helped him earn the publicists' title "King of Hollywood." But since I think he should have won the award a year earlier, I have another choice for the 1934 Oscar. 

... when it should have gone to ... 
Carole Lombard and John Barrymore in Twentieth Century 
Carole Lombard and John Barrymore in Twentieth Century
The other great screwball comedy of 1934 got no notice from the Academy -- not for Barrymore, not for Lombard, not for director Howard Hawks, not for the screenplay by Ben Hecht and Charles MacArthur, adapting their own play with the help of Gene Fowler and Preston Sturges. Go figure. But the Library of Congress added the movie to the National Film Registry in 2011, noting among other things that it was the "last great film role" for Barrymore. They might have said, "the greatest." 

Best Actor, 1931-32

Awards presented November 18, 1932
(Films released from August 1, 1931 through July 31, 1932 were eligible.)


The nominees were ... 
... when they should have been ... 
(Tie) Wallace Beery in The Champ and Fredric March in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. March led Beery by one vote, which under the Academy rules at that time constituted a tie. In fact, up to a three-vote difference would be ruled a tie; before Pricewaterhouse Coopers -- at that time just Price Waterhouse -- took over the balloting in 1934, the Academy seemed to want a sizable margin of error. (Today, only an identical number of votes counts as a tie.) Beery had worked steadily as a heavy or a comic in silent pictures, starting in 1913, including a series of one-reel shorts in which he played a drag role: Sweedie, the Swedish maid. He became a star with the arrival of sound, though he owed his stardom to two women: Screenwriter Frances Marion had teamed him with Marie Dressler in Min and Bill and Tugboat Annie; Marion had also written the role in The Big House that earned Beery his first Oscar nomination. The teaming with Dressler ended with her death in 1934, after which Beery returned to supporting roles. March, who would go on to a long screen career, winning a second Oscar for The Best Years of Our Lives, had been discovered by a Paramount scout in a touring production of The Royal Family, in which he parodied John Barrymore. He earned his first Oscar nomination when he re-created that role on screen. 

... when it should have gone to ... 
with Joan Crawford
with Greta Garbo 
 Unlike his brother, Lionel, and his sister, Ethel, John Barrymore never won an Oscar. He was never even nominated for one. He had been acclaimed as a stage actor, particularly as Shakespeare's Richard III and Hamlet, but we have only the reviews to go by. His one turn at Shakespeare on screen was in the 1936 MGM Romeo and Juliet, with its superannuated teenagers:  thirty-six-year-old Norma Shearer as Juliet, forty-four-year-old Leslie Howard as Romeo, and fifty-four-year-old Barrymore as Mercutio. Even so, we have glimpses there of what Barrymore may have been like in his prime: His performance is amusingly over-the-top, containing the energy that the rest of the movie sorely needs. He had made silent films starting in 1914, but after a 1925 appearance as Hamlet in London, he gave up the stage and joined Lionel in Hollywood, where his good looks and rakish ways fit right in. His finest screen performance is probably in 1934's Twentieth Century, in which director Howard Hawks, the screenplay by Ben Hecht and Charles MacArthur (plus some uncredited work by Preston Sturges), and an uninhibited performance by Carole Lombard brought out the madcap best in Barrymore. Grand Hotel, of course, is melodramatic to the point of absurdity, but Barrymore gives it a center and a measure of credibility, especially in his scenes with Garbo, Crawford, and particularly his brother, Lionel. Eventually, Barrymore's alcoholism began to destroy his career, however, and at the end he was playing small roles in throwaway movies, unable to memorize lines and relying on cue cards to get through his scenes.